CONFIDENTIAL
CONFIDENTIAL
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL · MARKETING LEADERSHIP
April 2026

Marketing
Cycle 25-26

Department Review

A focused view of the Marketing team's performance across Cycle 25-26 — individual results, competency profiles, and how the team positions relative to the broader PI AgSciences Brazil benchmark.

6
Team members
3.19
Department mean
4.23
Top rating
4
Sub-regions
01 · Department Overview

Marketing at a glance.

How the team is delivering across Cycle 25-26 — the shape of performance, the strongest competencies, and how the department positions in the broader company context.

Department mean
3.19/ 5.00
σ = 0.60 · n = 6
Exceeds (≥4.0)
1
Top-quartile contributors
Meets (3.0–4.0)
3
Solid delivery backbone
Positioning
93.0%
of company mean · below company pace
Where Marketing sits vs. the company
Visual comparison of average Overall rating. Each dot is anonymized — no individual comparison, just the team's general position.
1.02.03.04.05.0
Company
3.43
Marketing
3.19
BuildingApproachingMeetingExceeding

Overall Rating distribution

Where Marketing team members land on the rating scale.

0
0.0
0
0.5
0
1.0
0
1.5
0
2.0
2
2.5
3
3.0
0
3.5
1
4.0
0
4.5

Competency strengths

Marketing profile ranked from strongest to weakest competency.

01 Problem Solving
Dept
3.50
Company
3.61
97% of company
02 Teamwork
Dept
3.50
Company
3.67
95% of company
03 Customer Service
Dept
3.33
Company
3.61
92% of company
04 Communications
Dept
3.17
Company
3.31
96% of company
05 Adaptability
Dept
3.17
Company
3.47
91% of company
06 Planning & Organization
Dept
2.67
Company
3.50
76% of company
02 · Team

Every review, one card.

Click any card for the full profile — competencies, goals, job duties, narrative comments, and general information including current compensation.

ET

Evelin Queiroz B. Tamura

Communications & Ops Marketing Manager
Marketing · Communications
TOP IN DEPT
4.23
4.25 G 5.00 JD 3.83 C
123% of company mean
LF

Luiz Eduardo Fischmann

Product Manager
Marketing · Product
3.33
4.00 G 3.00 JD 3.17 C
97% of company mean
GP

Gabriel Dutra de Sousa Pacheco

Market Development
Marketing · Market Development
3.19
2.75 G 3.00 JD 3.50 C
93% of company mean
NM

Natalia Politti Manzatto

Market Access Manager
Marketing · Market Access
3.17
2.33 G 3.00 JD 3.67 C
92% of company mean
GF

Gabriel Pedrosa Da Costa Freitas

Market Development
Marketing · Market Development
2.71
2.50 G 3.00 JD 2.67 C
79% of company mean
LF

Lino R Rios Furia

Marketing Development Manager
Marketing · Market Development
2.50
3.00 G 2.00 JD 2.50 C
73% of company mean
03 · Positioning

How each team member sits in context.

For each person: where they land on the 1–5 rating scale, with reference lines for Marketing mean (solid colored line) and Company mean (dashed grey). The % value shows proximity to the company average — not a ranking. The goal is context, not competition.

Marketing mean (3.19)
Company mean (3.43)
Individual rating
ET
Evelin Queiroz B. Tamura
Communications & Ops Marketing Manager
4.23
123%
of company avg
LF
Luiz Eduardo Fischmann
Product Manager
3.33
97%
of company avg
GP
Gabriel Dutra de Sousa Pacheco
Market Development
3.19
93%
of company avg
NM
Natalia Politti Manzatto
Market Access Manager
3.17
92%
of company avg
GF
Gabriel Pedrosa Da Costa Freitas
Market Development
2.71
79%
of company avg
LF
Lino R Rios Furia
Marketing Development Manager
2.50
73%
of company avg
💡 How to read this A proximity of 100% means the person is right at the company average. Above 100% indicates delivery above the company-wide benchmark, below 100% indicates ratings below it. This is not a judgment — it is calibration context. The distribution of the Marketing team naturally produces a mix above and below the company mean.